The time has come to know what processor is faster, it is faster. Aside all other factors, such as the cost of the system, its durability and upper potential. Come to the question of principle, a victory is a victory. To this end, go to our colleagues to visit.
On the Greek site HWBox. gr a great comparison of the different processor architectures. Among the participants tested were observed, two representatives of AMD and three Intel. From AMD - it Phenom II (Deneb) and Phenom X4 (Agena). From Intel - Core 2 Quad (Kentsfield/Yorkfield) and the Core i7 (Bloomfield). All processors except the Phenom X4 (Agena), were dispersed to the frequency of 3, 7 GHz. Separately, compared the performance of Phenom and Phenom II, the operating frequency in this case was 3, 0 GHz. For a system based on Nehalem was found 3 GB of RAM for all other parties to 2 GB. Graphics card provides support for GeForce GTX 260. The full version of the review in the Greek language is here.
We will not give timetables, for the simple reason that there are many. Sound, only the main points.
Synthetic discipline depending on the selected test react differently to participants in the test. In fact, the performance of Phenom II is at the level of the Core 2 Quad (Kentsfield/Yorkfield) and rarely reaches the level of Core i7 (Bloomfield). Comparison Phenom and Phenom II said nichtozhnom advantage of new items, though not forget about the great potential of the frequency processors Phenom II.
In some disciplines 3DMark situation similar to synthetics. Old good Kentsfield feels perfectly next to the Phenom II. Gaming applications with small permits show a similar picture. The first place for the Core i7, at the second, with a variable margin, all the rest. In high-resolution video performance depends on processor support. It is noteworthy that in a game better than Phenom II marked advantage over the Phenom.
is always the strength of the AMD processors were the results of multi WPrime. Processor Phenom II confidently bypassing the representatives of the Core 2 Quad, and close to the Core i7.
Applications to work with 3D graphics to show the place the processor Phenom II. He was far from the Core i7, but it is comfortably close to Kentsfield and Yorkfield.
Very revealing measure power consumption. That`s performance Bloomfield and Deneb almost equal, that is not very good for the Phenom II.
In summary, you should say that of what the price will be at the core Phenom II, and will determine their success. Yes, they have demonstrated performance at the level of generation of processors Core 2 Quad, and it is possible to recognize the victory. However, computing power Core i7 them away. Let`s see, time will show, for any product purchase will vote in their purse.
|
